Actually, the title is a lie. I wish I had lots of hammock-chairs and  floor cushions, and that we could get rid of armchairs and couches  without other people in my household having fits.
I've seen this being passed around Facebook the past few days, and have,  thus far, bitten my tongue. So now my tongue is full teeth marks and is  too sore to bite on anymore. http://m.examiner.com/k-12-in-topeka/in-what-other-profession
I think I understand what he's trying to say, and agree that generally,  no single teacher should be held accountable for the graduating or  dropping out of any single student. Still, I thought he made some very  poor analogies, among other disagreements I have with him. All of the  other professions he sites are primarily reactive, not specifically  educational or preventative. If firefighters spent seven hours a day in a  home, actively trying to make it as fire-resistant as possible, and the  house still caught fire, then it would be a more accurate comparison.  When a person sees doctors for years and the doctors fail to catch,  diagnose, or effectively treat a treatable illness/condition, we do  question them and/or mainstream medicine and their effectiveness, as  much as some of us question any teacher and our current education  system.
It struck me as yet another person who doesn't want to think about the  implications of things like the USA's ranking in PISA surveys; that they  might be part of or supporting a failing system; that if they are truly  dedicated to effective, quality, equal education for all children, they  need to help change the system they are a part of instead of blindly  defending it.
Believe it or not, I have a lot of respect for teaching as a profession.  I know alot of really dedicated teachers. I come from a family steeped  with teachers. Generations of teachers. My mother, my grandmother, my  great-grandmother, and even (get ready to gasp) I was a teacher.  Admittedly, I was a substitute/assistant preschool teacher and  elementary school classroom volunteer. I did not finish my degree in  education. When I started college, my goal was to be a teacher. The  reasons I didn't finish aside, among the reasons I wanted to be a  teacher were to be better than many of the teachers I had had and met,  and to help reform the system from the inside.  I know a few awesome  individuals who are teachers, in public schools, who are doing just that  -pushing limits, breaking stigmas, managing their classrooms and  teaching in the most effective, quality, equal, up-to-date  evidence-based ways they can without getting themselves reprimanded or  fired. They are not the ones posting and reposting articles like the one  linked to above. They are educators who recognize that some of those  "arm-chair educators and anti-teacher, anti-public school evangelists"  are not any of those things. (I think it's funny that he resorts to  generalizations, name calling and finger pointing, given that those are  among his complaints.) They are the ones recognizing that not everything  you are taught in college is fact, or permanent. Not everything in your  textbooks is current or based on unbiased scientific study. Not  everything being pushed for by certain individuals or organizations is  actually healthy for our children. They are the ones who realize that  just because someone didn't take the tests and turn in homework at an  institution comparable to the one they graduated from doesn't mean they  haven't done the same amount, or more, of reading and researching, maybe  even the same books that were assigned to college students, and getting  the same or more hands on experience.
I have no doubt he received some truly rude, anti-teacher, anti-public  school, evangelical responses. He seems intentionally offensive, so I  don't think it should surprise anyone that he elicited offensive  retorts. I wish he would have taken a few minutes to word his post less  argumentatively and judgmentally, with better analogies and examples. I  wish that he seemed more communicative and open to recognizing that not  every "arm-chair educator" is an uneducated, anti-teacher and  anti-public school evangelist, and that even if some of them are, that  doesn't necessarily mean their opinions or evidence are inherently  invalid, let alone that the opinions, information and resources offered  by all who disagree with him on  this subject are inherently invalid. Some of them, who love the idea of  quality, equal public education for everyone, are simply sad that that  is not what is happening in the USA, and offer evidence of that, and  ideas on how the situation could be improved. Some of those "arm-chair  educators," who object to traditional  schooling methods and current  practices in the United States of America, use to or still do sit behind  teachers desks in public or other mainstream schools, or squat next to  children to engage in respectful exchanges, literally at their level,  and inspire a love for learning.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I appreciate respectful comments, whether you agree or not with my views. I value diversity. However, please remember that this is my house, and I can tell you to leave. Anything I deem purely offensive, mean-spirited or disrespectful, with insufficient pertinent content value, will be deleted.